NH Construction Law
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Links

#9:  Licensing of Contractors: Is It Needed?

6/25/2014

0 Comments

 
The widespread practice of licensing professionals – doctors, lawyers, architects and engineers, insurance brokers, real estate agents, even barbers – stems from the notion that a basic level of competence ought to be demonstrated before these professionals are turned loose on the public to practice their trade.  In about half of the states (check out www.nascla.org for a list) and in some cities or counties of other states (New York comes to mind), residential and occasionally even commercial contractors are included among those who must be licensed.  Here in the land of “Live Free or Die,” however, contractors are free of state licensing requirements.  No demonstration of skill or knowledge of building codes is required as a condition of going into business.  

There are exceptions for certain specialty trades.  New Hampshire does require licensing of plumbers, electricians, septic system installers, water well contractors, asbestos abatement and lead abatement contactors.  The Department of Transportation also requires bidder prequalification for its projects, a process that does inquire somewhat into the bidder’s experience and abilities.  But when it comes to most tasks involved in the construction process, be it digging a cellar hole, pouring concrete, framing, roofing, installing HVAC or masonry, anyone can be in business, whether or not they know which end of a hammer to grab or which lever of a backhoe to pull.  It’s not that our Legislature thinks that contractors can do less damage than barbers (they surely realize that a bad haircut eventually corrects itself, a bad building doesn’t).  Still, every time a bill has been before the Legislature to require statewide licensing of contractors, it has been defeated.  Soundly.

If I may offer my $0.02 here, I don’t see a compelling need for contractor licensing, even in the residential arena where owners tend to be less sophisticated than their commercial counterparts and less likely to engage an architect or other professional to protect their interests by reviewing compliance with plans and specs and certifying payment of requisitions. 

First, in construction settings the market does a particularly good job of weeding out incompetence.  The various trades involved in constructing a building are coordinated by a general contractor who interfaces with the owner, relieving the owner of the burden of hiring individual subs.  The GC is in a far better position than the owner to check on the competence of drywallers, insulators, painters, etc. – and has every incentive to hire only the good ones, because the GC is on the hook to the owner for their performance.  If they are bad, they make the GC look bad -- and in this era of electronic communication and Better Business Bureau/Angie’s List websites, bad builders don’t last in business. 

Second, most municipalities have building inspectors and code enforcement officers whose job it is to review construction for compliance with building code requirements.  When they do their job right, this regulatory inquiry provides owners with at least some basic protection from unsafe structures – which is precisely the rationale of a licensing scheme.  Sure, they miss things occasionally, but a builder can’t count on that, and so must at least try to build a code-compliant structure.

I am not saying that there is no need for legislation of any kind related to contractors – but I do think that where problem areas are identified, legislation addressing them should be targeted and narrow.  For example, one of the largest category of complaints against contractors made to the Consumer Protection Bureau at the Attorney General’s Office is not poor quality construction, but abandonment of the project after taking a substantial deposit.  That type of fraudulent practice can be dealt with by requiring a surety bond as a condition of taking a sizeable deposit.  A full blown licensing law would be overkill here.

All things considered, the quality of construction in the Granite State does not appear to be below average.  If it ain't broke . . .


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Frank Spinella

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.