NH Construction Law
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Links

#8:  Payment Bonds

6/16/2014

0 Comments

 
If they’ve been in the game long enough, subcontractors and suppliers all eventually run into difficulties getting paid for their work and materials by those who contracted for them.  The option of suing for payment isn’t always attractive and won’t always be fruitful (e.g., when a general contractor goes under).  For those occasions, wouldn’t it be nice to have a third party with deep pockets step up and guarantee payment?  That is precisely what a payment bond is supposed to do.  In exchange for the contractor’s payment of a premium and a written promise to indemnify any losses (secured by a pledge of assets and personal guarantees of the contractor’s principals), a bonding company will put its own credit on the line.

On some private construction projects and on virtually all public construction projects, general contractors are required to furnish a bond, typically issued by an insurance company, for the benefit of those who supply labor and materials to the job.  In the public setting this is a matter of statute (RSA 447:16-18 for state and municipal work, 40 U.S.C. §§ 3131-3134 for federal work), intended as a substitute for mechanic’s liens, which do not attach to public buildings. 

Bond claims are subject to strictly-enforced notice requirements.  Under the federal statute the claim must be made by giving written notice to the contractor within 90 days of the claimant’s last day of work or furnishing of materials.  The state statute is more generous: a claim must be filed with the appropriate governmental body “within 90 days after completion and acceptance of the project by the contracting party.”  The express terms of the bond may have additional notice provisions and deadlines – but if these differ from the statutory provisions, the statutory provisions will control for any bond given on a project that is subject to the statute.

One important difference between payment bonds on federal projects and payment bonds on state or municipal projects lies in who can claim under them.  The federal project payment bond covers persons having "a direct relationship with the principal or a subcontractor of the principal;" lower tiers are shut out.  The state statute has no such limitation.


A payment bond guarantees payment of what the contractor actually owes, and that amount may be in dispute.  If the contractor purchasing the bond disputes the claim in whole or in part, the bonding company will typically do some investigation to determine how much is justly due―including asking for a sworn itemization of the claim and supporting documents, and getting its principal’s side of the story documented as well.  If a good faith investigation leaves the matter unclear, it’s a safe bet that the bonding company won’t pay the amount in dispute without its principal’s consent, which usually means that a lawsuit must be filed on the bond.  Those lawsuits have their own separate statutory and/or contractual requirements and deadlines.

Procedural defenses like insufficient notice or untimeliness aside, it is often said that a bonding company has all of the defenses to payment that the general contractor has (bankruptcy being the most notable exception).  That may be overstating things.  Thus far no reported New Hampshire case has ruled on a key question that has divided courts in other states: if there is a “pay-if-paid” provision in the subcontract and the general contractor hasn’t been paid by the owner, can the bonding company also hide behind the “pay-if-paid” clause and avoid paying the sub?  The issue is nuanced; I will elaborate in a future blog.  It may seem unfair to the bonded contractor to require the bonding company to pay in such circumstances, given that the contractor must reimburse the bonding company for every penny paid out on a claim, despite not having been paid itself. But there are a few precedents reaching that result.

A payment bond takes the place of a mechanic’s lien only in the public works arena; the availability of a payment bond on a private project does not prevent simultaneous pursuit of a mechanic’s lien remedy.  Even on a state or local government project, a bond does not preclude the claimant from also getting a lien on the monies due or to become due from the awarding authority to the general contractor under RSA 447:15.  And in my experience, liening the money is the more powerful choice.


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Frank Spinella

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly