NH Construction Law
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Links

#10:  The Risks of Construction Change Directives

7/4/2014

1 Comment

 
Most large and complex commercial projects today are marked by numerous changes in the original scope of work, as issues are discovered during the course of construction, or as owners change their minds mid-stream.  What starts out as a defined scope of work for a defined price on a defined schedule ends up getting altered on all three fronts.  The owner wants the flexibility to change course, yet not be ambushed by a price for the change that busts the budget or by unacceptable delays in project completion.

Under Article 7 of the AIA’s popular form contract AIA A201 General Conditions, these owner protections are provided for.  If owner and general contractor agree on the price and time effects of a change in scope, they simply execute a written Change Order which modifies their agreement, and everybody is happy.  If they don’t agree, however, the contractor must still implement the owner’s desired change in scope―provided that he receives a Construction Change Directive, defined as “a written order prepared by the Architect and signed by the Owner and Architect, directing a change in the Work prior to agreement on adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, or both.”  In effect, by issuing a CCD the owner says “do what I tell you to do, and we’ll deal with pricing and/or schedule changes later.”

Despite mechanisms built into the contract for pricing the change later (agreed-upon unit prices; time and materials plus a mark-up for overhead and profit; etc.), a CCD presents some risk for the contractor.  If the CCD requires a significant reduction in scope, the contractor who was counting on the full scope of work must now scramble to fill a sudden hole in his schedule in order to make up for lost revenue.  If the CCD requires a significant expansion in scope, the contractor may have other projects on his schedule that will now suffer.  But the biggest risk is one of profitability of the new work.  Precisely because the price is not agreed upon up front, the control that the contractor enjoyed at the bid stage and at the contracting stage is gone; his compensation for a portion of the work will now be determined by a third party (generally the project Architect) who will scrutinize his measurements – measurements that must now be carefully logged and documented by the contractor (for free!) as to units/yards/linear feet, as to man hours, as to materials used.  The documentation headache that he hoped to avoid by entering into a fixed-price rather than a cost-plus arrangement has just started pounding.  And if the Architect isn’t satisfied and asks for more detail, payment that should have been received this month is delayed until next month – a potential cash flow problem for the contractor.

Notwithstanding issuance of a CCD, if the change desired by the owner is a “cardinal change” the contractor can decline.  Cardinal changes are those that either drastically increase scope (say, tripling the amount of work) or call for a different type of work (say, changing the framing from wood to steel).  Some recognition of this principle is built into the A201 General Conditions, which limit Construction Change Directives to work “within the general scope of the Contract.”  The distinction is between tweaking a project, and asking for what amounts to an entirely different project.  As one court has put it, "There is no exact formula for determining the point at which a single change or a series of changes must be considered to go beyond the scope of the contract and necessarily in breach of it.  Each case must be analyzed on its own facts and in light of its own circumstances, giving just consideration to the magnitude and quality of the changes ordered and their cumulative effect upon the project as a whole."  Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 351 F.2d 956, 966 (Ct. Cl. 1965).  And without a bright line test for when a change is cardinal, the contractor is at risk in declining a CCD and walking away from a project.   Allied Materials & Equip. Co., Inc. v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 406, 569 F.2d 562, 564 (1978) ("Undoubtedly, the cautious contractor might often proceed under the revised contract because of doubt whether he could invoke the cardinal change doctrine.").


1 Comment
Home Remodeling link
3/19/2020 09:25:52 pm

There is no denying that one of the most important parts of house remodeling is locating and hiring the right home remodeler for the job. Some people may be under the impression that as long as large renovations are not being made, it is not as imperative that a qualified remodeler be employed. This is completely false.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Frank Spinella

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.